Davis v. Grosso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davis v. Grosso

295 A.D.2d 347, 744 N.Y.S.2d 339, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 295 A.D.2d 347 (Davis v. Grosso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Grosso, 295 A.D.2d 347, 744 N.Y.S.2d 339, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to decide the petitioner’s pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment in an action entitled People v Davis, pending [348]*348under Queens County Indictment No. 67/00, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In the underlying case, the motion to dismiss the indictment was determined by decision and order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 14, 2001. Accordingly, the proceeding is dismissed as academic. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Krausman and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to decide the petitioner’s pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment in an action entitled People v Davis, pending [348]*348under Queens County Indictment No. 67/00, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In the underlying case, the motion to dismiss the indictment was determined by decision and order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 14, 2001. Accordingly, the proceeding is dismissed as academic. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Krausman and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 A.D.2d 347, 744 N.Y.S.2d 339, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-grosso-nyappdiv-2002.