Davis v. Gorham Savings Bank
143 A.2d 814, 154 Me. 83, 1958 Me. LEXIS 75
Opinion
This case was heard and decided by the court below without the aid of a jury. The defendant prevailed. Plaintiff now seeks review by means of a general motion for a new trial addressed to the Law Court. This method of review is available only in cases involving jury trials. The matter is jurisdictional and the Law Court is without statutory power to act. Levee v. Mardin, 126 Me. 133; Espeargnette v. Merrill, 107 Me. 304.
Motion dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Gorham Savings Bank, 143 A.2d 814, 154 Me. 83, 1958 Me. LEXIS 75 (Me. 1958).
143 A.2d 814 (Davis v. Gorham Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Espeargnette v. Merrill
78 A. 290 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1910)
Levee v. Mardin
136 A. 696 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1927)