Davis v. Georgetown Bridge Co.
This text of 7 F. Cas. 131 (Davis v. Georgetown Bridge Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(nem. con.) permitted tlie account to be read in evidence; and instructed the jury that if they should be of opinion from the evidence that the account was stated in the handwriting of Walter Smith, and that he was the treasurer, or authorized to settle their accounts, the account was proper evidence in support of the issue. And that if they should also be of opinion that Temple-man, Lowndes and Deakins were directors at the time of certifying the account, or were the authorized agents of the company for the purpose of making contracts, their signature of the account was also proper evidence in support of the issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 F. Cas. 131, 1 Cranch 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-georgetown-bridge-co-circtddc-1803.