Davis v. Gentry

415 P.3d 1004
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedApril 16, 2018
DocketNo. 75413
StatusPublished

This text of 415 P.3d 1004 (Davis v. Gentry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Gentry, 415 P.3d 1004 (Neb. 2018).

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court decision vacating and closing an appeal from the justice court decision. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; David M. Jones, Judge.

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals several jurisdictional defects. Specifically, the notice of appeal appears to be prematurely filed, before the entry of a final written judgment, and is therefore of no effect. See NRAP 4(a)(1) ; Rust v. Clark Cty. School District , 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987). In addition, the district courts have final appellate jurisdiction over cases arising in the justice courts. Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6 ; see also Waugh v. Casazza, 85 Nev. 520, 521, 458 P.2d 359, 360 (1969). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we therefore

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rust v. Clark County School District
747 P.2d 1380 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1987)
Waugh v. Casazza
458 P.2d 359 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
415 P.3d 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-gentry-nev-2018.