Davis v. Garden Hills Corp.

157 S.E. 472, 172 Ga. 311, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 81
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 21, 1931
DocketNo. 7356
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 157 S.E. 472 (Davis v. Garden Hills Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Garden Hills Corp., 157 S.E. 472, 172 Ga. 311, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 81 (Ga. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

.1. A general demurrer to a petition should not be sustained if the facts entitle the plaintiff to any of the substantial relief prayed. McLaren v. Steapp, 1 Ga. 376; Dyson v. Washington Telephone Co., 157 Ga. 67 (3) (121 S. E. 105); Blaylock v. Hackel, 164 Ga. 257 (5) (138 S. E. 333); Arteaga v. Arteaga, 169 Ga. 595 (4) (151 S. E. 5).

2. The petition in this ease set forth facts which entitled the plaintiff to some of the substantial relief prayed; and the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the judgment of the trial judge sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concu/r, except Eill, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burke v. Life Insurance Co. of Georgia
123 S.E.2d 426 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Reardon v. Bland
58 S.E.2d 377 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Shingler v. Shingler
192 S.E. 824 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 S.E. 472, 172 Ga. 311, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-garden-hills-corp-ga-1931.