Davis v. Frostee

197 So. 2d 2, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4047
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 1967
DocketNo. 35908
StatusPublished

This text of 197 So. 2d 2 (Davis v. Frostee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Frostee, 197 So. 2d 2, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4047 (Fla. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 28, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

[3]*3Our consideration, of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The motion of petitioner for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 So. 2d 2, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-frostee-fla-1967.