Davis v. Frisella

Missouri Court of Appeals

Davis v. Frisella

894 S.W.2d 252, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 395, 1995 WL 95018

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 7, 1995·No. No. 64915·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Frisella appeals from the judgment and decree modifying provisions of a [253]*253dissolution decree pertaining to child custody and support. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are supported by the evidence, are not against the weight of the evidence and do not erroneously declare or apply the law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Frisella appeals from the judgment and decree modifying provisions of a [253]*253dissolution decree pertaining to child custody and support. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are supported by the evidence, are not against the weight of the evidence and do not erroneously declare or apply the law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Davis v. Frisella, 894 S.W.2d 252, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 395, 1995 WL 95018 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

894 S.W.2d 252 (Davis v. Frisella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.