Davis v. Forest River, Inc.

771 N.W.2d 789, 2009 WL 2959002

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. Forest River, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 485 Mich. 941 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 2009·No. 136114·Published

Opinion

771 N.W.2d 789 (2009)

Keith Gayle DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FOREST RIVER, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and
Kitsmiller RV, Inc., Defendant.

Docket No. 136114. COA No. 270478.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 15, 2009.

Order

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellant for extension of the time for filing its reply brief is considered and it is GRANTED IN PART ONLY. The time for filing is extended to September 28, 2009.

Motions by General Motors Company, Chrysler Group LLC, Ford Motor Company, and the Recreational Vehicle Industry Association and the National Marine Manufacturers Association for leave to file briefs amicus curiae are considered and they are GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

771 N.W.2d 789 (2009)

Keith Gayle DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FOREST RIVER, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and
Kitsmiller RV, Inc., Defendant.

Docket No. 136114. COA No. 270478.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 15, 2009.

Order

Davis v. Forest River, Inc., 771 N.W.2d 789, 2009 WL 2959002 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

771 N.W.2d 789 (Davis v. Forest River, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Keith Gayle DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FOREST RIVER, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and Kitsmiller RV, Inc., Defendant.

Order

Keith Gayle DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FOREST RIVER, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and
Kitsmiller RV, Inc., Defendant.