Davis v. First National Bank

28 Ind. 240
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Ray, J.

— The questions presented in- this record arise upon the overruling of a demurrer filed by the appellant to [241]*241two paragraphs of the appellee’s reply to appellant’s answer to the complaint.

J. M. Butler, for appellant. T. A. Hendricks, O. B. Hord, A. W. Hendricks and S. C. Willson, for appellee.

There was no brief filed by the appellant, but the cause was submitted upon the appellee’s motion and brief. "Wo will not, therefore, discuss the errors assigned by appellant, but affirm the case, as, in our opinion, the paragraphs of the reply were sufficient, and the action of the court in overruling the demurrer was therefore correct.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs, and three per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. First National Bank, 28 Ind. 240 (Ind. 1867).

28 Ind. 240 (Davis v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Fillmore
15 Kan. 333 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1875)