Davis v. First National Bank

68 So. 261, 192 Ala. 8, 1915 Ala. LEXIS 9
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 22, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 68 So. 261 (Davis v. First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. First National Bank, 68 So. 261, 192 Ala. 8, 1915 Ala. LEXIS 9 (Ala. 1915).

Opinion

ANDERSON, C. J.

(1, 2) The note sued upon was executed by B. F. W. Davis and was made payable to [9]*9himself and was indorsed by said Davis in blank before it fell into the hands of the plaintiff. Therefore, as the last, and in fact only, indorsement was in blank, the note was, when acquired by the plaintiff, payable to bearer.- — Subdivision 5, § 4966, of the Code of 1907. This being the case, it was negotiated to the plaintiff and its predecessor by a delivery thereof under the terms of section 4985 of the Code. See, also, section 4989. The trial court did not err in holding that plaintiff was the legal holder of the note and could maintain a suit upon same, although not- indorsed by the party from whom it purchased same.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mayfield, Somerville, and Thomas, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Continental Casualty Co. v. Brawner
148 So. 809 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Davis v. Florey
77 So. 413 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 So. 261, 192 Ala. 8, 1915 Ala. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-first-national-bank-ala-1915.