Davis v. First Nat. Bank
This text of 161 P. 931 (Davis v. First Nat. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion
By the decree Alfred C. Schmitt and the other parties who were made defendants in the cross-bill were held to be jointly and severally liable for the payment of the promissory note which was executed by the [477]*477plaintiffs to the bank. A reversal or modification of that decree would be an advantage to the parties who were not served with the notice of the appeal, and for that reason they are not adverse: Lane v. Wentworth, 69 Or. 242 (133 Pac. 348, 138 Pac. 468); United States National Bank v. Shefler, 77 Or. 579 (143 Pac. 51, 152 Pac. 234).
The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
Motion Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 P. 931, 86 Or. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-first-nat-bank-or-1916.