Davis v. Embry

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Davis v. Embry

230 S.E.2d 314, 140 Ga. App. 181, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1393

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 25, 1976

Docket52714

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 230 S.E.2d 314 (Davis v. Embry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Embry, 230 S.E.2d 314, 140 Ga. App. 181, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1393 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

This foreclosure on personalty suit was tried by the court. In entering judgment for plaintiff, the court failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by CPA § 52 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)). Accordingly, the appeal is remanded to the trial court with direction that it vacate the judgment, prepare, or cause to be prepared, appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law, and enter a new judgment after which the losing party shall be free to enter another appeal if he should desire. Spivey v. Mayson, 124 Ga. App. 775 (186 SE2d 154).

Appeal remanded with direction.

Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur. Raborn L. Davis, pro se. Howard H. Johnston, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Judge.

This foreclosure on personalty suit was tried by the court. In entering judgment for plaintiff, the court failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by CPA § 52 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)). Accordingly, the appeal is remanded to the trial court with direction that it vacate the judgment, prepare, or cause to be prepared, appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law, and enter a new judgment after which the losing party shall be free to enter another appeal if he should desire. Spivey v. Mayson, 124 Ga. App. 775 (186 SE2d 154).

Appeal remanded with direction.

Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur. Raborn L. Davis, pro se. Howard H. Johnston, for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 S.E.2d 314, 140 Ga. App. 181, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-embry-gactapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack