Davis v. Elliott
This text of 1910 OK 8 (Davis v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Mayes county. Rule No. 7 of this court (20 Okla, viii, 95 Pac. vi) requires.the plaintiff in error in each civil cause to serve a brief on counsel for defendant in error within 40 days after the petition in error has been filed, and at the-same time to file 15 copies of his brief with the clerk of the court. Although more than one year has elapsed since the filing of the petition in error herein before the case was reached for submission, no brief for plaintiff in error has ever been filed, and no extension of time asked for. By failure of plafin- *434 tiff in error to file his brief in support of his petition in error, he has waived his right to have his appeal heard in this court. Le Breteon v. Swartzel, 14 Okla. 521, 78 Pac. 323; Walker et al. v. Hannewincle, 24 Okla. 521, 103 Pac. 585.
'This proceeding is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1910 OK 8, 106 P. 838, 25 Okla. 433, 1910 Okla. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-elliott-okla-1910.