Davis v. Elliott

1910 OK 8, 106 P. 838, 25 Okla. 433, 1910 Okla. LEXIS 285
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 11, 1910·No. 240·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Hayes, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Mayes county. Rule No. 7 of this court (20 Okla, viii, 95 Pac. vi) requires.the plaintiff in error in each civil cause to serve a brief on counsel for defendant in error within 40 days after the petition in error has been filed, and at the-same time to file 15 copies of his brief with the clerk of the court. Although more than one year has elapsed since the filing of the petition in error herein before the case was reached for submission, no brief for plaintiff in error has ever been filed, and no extension of time asked for. By failure of plafin- *434 tiff in error to file his brief in support of his petition in error, he has waived his right to have his appeal heard in this court. Le Breteon v. Swartzel, 14 Okla. 521, 78 Pac. 323; Walker et al. v. Hannewincle, 24 Okla. 521, 103 Pac. 585.

'This proceeding is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Elliott, 1910 OK 8, 106 P. 838, 25 Okla. 433, 1910 Okla. LEXIS 285 (Okla. 1910).

1910 OK 8 (Davis v. Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Essex Storage Electric Co. v. Victory Lumber Co.
108 A. 426 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1919)
Ridley v. Petty
1919 OK 32 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1919)
Oberly v. Harris
1914 OK 488 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Dill
1914 OK 415 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
McConkey v. Sorrell
1911 OK 509 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Mayo v. Mills
1911 OK 508 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Douglas v. Clayton Townsite Co.
1911 OK 146 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Palmer-Gregory Chiropractic College v. Hart
1910 OK 243 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)
John v. Paullin
1909 OK 224 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)