Davis v. Edmondson
104 A. 582, 261 Pa. 199, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 714
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 22, 1918
DocketAppeal, No. 35
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases
This text of 104 A. 582 (Davis v. Edmondson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davis v. Edmondson, 104 A. 582, 261 Pa. 199, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 714 (Pa. 1918).
Opinion
The correct conclusion of the learned court below was that it clearly appears from plaintiff’s statement of his cause of action that the injuries he sustained were due to his carelessness or negligence, and the judgment, which was properly entered under the Act of May 14,1915, P. L. 488, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Just v. Sons of Italy Hall
368 A.2d 308 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Slobodzian v. Beighley
164 A.2d 923 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Polm v. Hession
363 Pa. 494 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Roessler v. O'Brien
201 P.2d 901 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1949)
Barth Et Vir v. Klinck
62 A.2d 841 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Grove v. Gardner
63 Pa. D. & C. 639 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1948)
Mogren Et Ux. v. Gadonas
58 A.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Bartek v. Grossman
52 A.2d 209 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
Vale v. Indiana County Theaters Co.
120 F.2d 495 (Third Circuit, 1941)
Luthier v. Kline
21 A.2d 138 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Fay v. 900 North 63d Street Corp.
9 A.2d 483 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.
2 A.2d 831 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Murphy v. Bernheim & Sons, Inc.
194 A. 194 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
185 A. 613 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Modony v. Megdal
178 A. 395 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Shuster v. Jaffola & Mark, Inc.
22 Pa. D. & C. 556 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1935)
Hoffner Et Ux. v. Bergdoll
164 A. 607 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Fordyce v. White Star Bus Lines
155 A. 98 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Murphy v. Omwake
14 Pa. D. & C. 179 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1930)
Dittus v. Johnson
12 Pa. D. & C. 132 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1928)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
104 A. 582, 261 Pa. 199, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-edmondson-pa-1918.