Davis v. Driver
This text of Davis v. Driver (Davis v. Driver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7344
ROY STEVE DAVIS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JOE DRIVER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-00111-FPS-JES)
Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy Steve Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Roy Steve Davis, a federal inmate, appeals the
district court’s order and judgment adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendations and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) habeas corpus petition. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by
the district court. See Davis v. Driver, No. 5:06-cv-00111-FPS-
JES (N.D.W. Va. June 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Davis v. Driver, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-driver-ca4-2009.