Davis v. Driver

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 2009
Docket09-7344
StatusUnpublished

This text of Davis v. Driver (Davis v. Driver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Driver, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7344

ROY STEVE DAVIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOE DRIVER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-00111-FPS-JES)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Steve Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Roy Steve Davis, a federal inmate, appeals the

district court’s order and judgment adopting the magistrate

judge’s recommendations and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2006) habeas corpus petition. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by

the district court. See Davis v. Driver, No. 5:06-cv-00111-FPS-

JES (N.D.W. Va. June 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Davis v. Driver, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-driver-ca4-2009.