Davis v. Donner
This text of 22 P. 879 (Davis v. Donner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order refusing to set aside an order for a writ of assistance. The order that a writ of assistance issue was a special order made after final judgment, and therefore an appeal might have been taken from it. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 963.)
[36]*36“ But defendants do not appeal from that order. They made a motion to set aside that order, and then appeal from the refusal to grant their motion. This is certainly not revisable; it is the mere negative action of the court declining to disturb its first decision. It is the decision which is the proper subject of complaint, and the refusal to alter it any number of times would not make it less so.” (Henly v. Hastings, 3 Cal. 341; Cal. S. R. R. Co. v. S. P. R. R. Co., 65 Cal. 295.)
Appeal dismissed.
Hearing in Bank denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 P. 879, 82 Cal. 35, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-donner-cal-1889.