Davis v. Dodds

Ohio Supreme Court

Davis v. Dodds

20 Ohio St. (N.S.) 473

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1870·Published

Opinion

By the Court:

Where real estate of the wife, held by her under the statute of March 23, 1866 (S. & S. 391), as her “ separate property,” is occupied by the husband as a family homestead, he is not the “ owner ” of such homestead within [474]*474the meaning of our statutes relating to the exemption of property from execution. Motion overruled.

Adam Clay for the motion. Howard <& Howard, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

Where real estate of the wife, held by her under the statute of March 23, 1866 (S. & S. 391), as her “ separate property,” is occupied by the husband as a family homestead, he is not the “ owner ” of such homestead within [474]*474the meaning of our statutes relating to the exemption of property from execution. Motion overruled.

Adam Clay for the motion. Howard <& Howard, contra.

Davis v. Dodds, 20 Ohio St. (N.S.) 473 (Ohio 1870).

Pincite

20 Ohio St. (N.S.) 473 (Davis v. Dodds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.