Davis v. Devore
This text of Davis v. Devore (Davis v. Devore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2487
SCOTT M. DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TOM DEVORE, a/k/a Anothy Joyave,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-04-3566-1)
Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 29, 2005
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scott M. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Scott M. Davis appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Davis v. Devore, No. CA-04-3566-1 (D.
Md. Nov. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Davis v. Devore, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-devore-ca4-2005.