Davis v. Department of State
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Freedom of Information Act complaint and imposing upon him a prefíling review system for future civil actions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Dep’t of State, No. 4:13-cv-00058-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2016). We deny all of Davis’ pending motions, including his motions to remand, to vacate, to appoint counsel, and to appoint a guardian ad li-tem. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
675 F. App'x 337 (Davis v. Department of State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.