Davis v. Dayton
This text of 6 Misc. 623 (Davis v. Dayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action is on a bank check made by the one defendant and indorsed by the other. It was dated February 13, 1893, and was two days afterwards delivered to the plaintiff by one Ward. The plaintiff paid full value therefor, and became a bona fide holder thereof, free of any and all equities between the original parties. In the hands of the plaintiff there was no defense, so that the evidence ruled out would have been of no use to the defendants if it had been admitted.
No error was committed at the trial, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
Newburger and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Misc. 623, 26 N.Y.S. 727, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-dayton-nynyccityct-1893.