Davis v. Davis

249 S.E.2d 90, 242 Ga. 322, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1191
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 4, 1978·No. 33833·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Marshall, Justice.

The defendant husband appeals from two orders of the trial court. The order granting temporary alimony, though appealable under Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) (3) (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072,1073; 1975, pp. 757, 758), has been abandoned by failure to either enumerate it as error or argue it. The order denying the appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is an interlocutory order, which is not appealable without a certificate of immediate review. Code Ann. § 6-701, supra, (a) 2 (A) and (B); Kristensen v. Kristensen, 238 Ga. 294 (232 SE2d 564) (1977). Therefore, the appellee wife’s motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Hall and Hill, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Davis, 249 S.E.2d 90, 242 Ga. 322, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1191 (Ga. 1978).

249 S.E.2d 90 (Davis v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

KRISTA RENEE CORDOVA v. AMY DAVIS
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2021
Shelly Namdar-Yeganeh v. Cyndi Namdar-Yeganeh
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2020
Cicely Mitchell v. Travis Grant, III
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2019
Melissa Kay Smith v. John Blake Pearce
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013
Ivey v. Bicknell
668 S.E.2d 894 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Atlanta Hanggliders & Ultralights, Inc. v. Rountree
314 S.E.2d 679 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)