Davis v. Davis
194 S.E. 175, 185 Ga. 64, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 677
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 191 Ga. 333 →
Opinion
Under the evidence appearing in the record, there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the judge in awarding the moderate amount here shown as temporary alimony and attorney’s fees. Judgment affirmed-.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Davis, 194 S.E. 175, 185 Ga. 64, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 677 (Ga. 1937).
194 S.E. 175 (Davis v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.