Davis v. Davis

139 S.E. 811, 165 Ga. 118, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 317
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 14, 1927
DocketNo. 5857
StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.E. 811 (Davis v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Davis, 139 S.E. 811, 165 Ga. 118, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 317 (Ga. 1927).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

Mrs. Julia Davis brought a petition against her husband, W. L. Davis, praying for an allowance of temporary alimony and attorney’s fees. At the conclusion of the hearing of evidence the court granted an order and judgment allowing $35 per month as temporary alimony and $75 as attorney’s fees. To this judgment the defendant excepted.

Upon consideration of the pleadings and evidence in the case, it does not appear that in rendering the judgment complained of there was such an abuse of discretion upon the part of the trial judge as would authorize this court to interfere with the judgment rendered.

In the bill of exceptions, after quoting excerpts from the testimony of several witnesses, it is recited that the defendant objected to such testimony, upon grounds duly stated, and that the court admitted the testimony over the objections made; and it is further recited that the “admission of each item of testimony complained of was error prejudicial to the defendant, and that it influenced the judgment against him.” But the plaintiff in error does not expressly except to the ruling of the court admitting this testimony; and consequently no question is raised for determination by this court as to whether such testimony was admissible or not. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 S.E. 811, 165 Ga. 118, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-davis-ga-1927.