Davis v. Davis Foundry & Machine Works

89 S.E. 600, 18 Ga. App. 508, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1067
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 31, 1916·No. 7353·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hodges, J.

The petition in this ease showing that if the servant was injured, he was injured by the negligence of a fellow servant, and that the injury was incident to the risk assumed in the service, the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county — Judge Nunn ally. February 15, 1916. Harris & Harris, for plaintiff. Barry Wright, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Davis Foundry & Machine Works, 89 S.E. 600, 18 Ga. App. 508, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1067 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

89 S.E. 600 (Davis v. Davis Foundry & Machine Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atkinson v. Empire Printing & Box Co.
45 S.E.2d 280 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)