Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Davis v. Davis Foundry & Machine Works

Davis v. Davis Foundry & Machine Works

89 S.E. 600, 18 Ga. App. 508, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1067
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 31, 1916
Docket7353
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 S.E. 600 (Davis v. Davis Foundry & Machine Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Davis Foundry & Machine Works, 89 S.E. 600, 18 Ga. App. 508, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1067 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Hodges, J.

The petition in this ease showing that if the servant was injured, he was injured by the negligence of a fellow servant, and that the injury was incident to the risk assumed in the service, the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county — Judge Nunn ally. February 15, 1916. Harris & Harris, for plaintiff. Barry Wright, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atkinson v. Empire Printing & Box Co.
45 S.E.2d 280 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 600, 18 Ga. App. 508, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-davis-foundry-machine-works-gactapp-1916.