Davis v. Davis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Davis v. Davis

721 So. 2d 424, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15003, 1998 WL 828044

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 691 So. 2d 626 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 1998·No. No. 97-4674·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

With regard to rehabilitative alimony and distribution of property, we find the final judgment adequate to allow meaningful appellate review, and we affirm. Appellant also questions the order requiring him to pay seventy percent of appellee’s attorneys’ fees. Because no actual award of fees has been made, this question is not ripe for appellate review.

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, KAHN and DAVIS, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

With regard to rehabilitative alimony and distribution of property, we find the final judgment adequate to allow meaningful appellate review, and we affirm. Appellant also questions the order requiring him to pay seventy percent of appellee’s attorneys’ fees. Because no actual award of fees has been made, this question is not ripe for appellate review.

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, KAHN and DAVIS, concur.

Davis v. Davis, 721 So. 2d 424, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15003, 1998 WL 828044 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

721 So. 2d 424 (Davis v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.