Davis v. Davis
81 F. 1003, 26 C.C.A. 682, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1931
This text of 81 F. 1003 (Davis v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davis v. Davis, 81 F. 1003, 26 C.C.A. 682, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1931 (5th Cir. 1897).
Opinion
The facts established by the evidence are not sufficient to warrant the finding that Samuel B. Newman, Sr., had actual notice of W. J. Davis’ equity in the lands in controversy, nor to warrant the presumption that Mrs. Mattie L. Newman, the mortgagee, knew, or ought to have known, of any such equity. The decree appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
81 F. 1003, 26 C.C.A. 682, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-davis-ca5-1897.