Davis v. Davis

81 F. 1003, 26 C.C.A. 682, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1931

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts established by the evidence are not sufficient to warrant the finding that Samuel B. Newman, Sr., had actual notice of W. J. Davis’ equity in the lands in controversy, nor to warrant the presumption that Mrs. Mattie L. Newman, the mortgagee, knew, or ought to have known, of any such equity. The decree appealed from is affirmed.