Davis v. Currie

266 U.S. 182, 45 S. Ct. 88, 69 L. Ed. 234, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2910
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 17, 1924·No. 60·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Mb. Justice McReynolds

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This writ must be dismissed. The petition therefor declared — The sole question presented is, “ Can damages for humiliation and wounded feelings be awarded the respondent against the petitioner, the United States Railroad Administration, under the provisions of the Federal Control Act, the proclamations of the President and the general orders of the Director General pursuant thereto? ”

At the hearing counsel relied on the following: “ The judgment against the Director General of Railroads for wounded feelings and humiliation arising out of a wanton, willful and malicious act of his servant is unauthorized, involving, essentially, the infliction of a penalty upon the Government.” The argument was that although the trial court distinctly limited the jury to actual damages, nevertheless, it necessarily follows from the size of the verdict that punitive damages were assessed against and a penalty was imposed upon the United States.

The petition did not state the case presented at the bar.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Currie, 266 U.S. 182, 45 S. Ct. 88, 69 L. Ed. 234, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2910 (1924).

266 U.S. 182 (Davis v. Currie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williamson v. Rubich
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 253 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1960)
Rice v. Sioux City Memorial Park Cemetery, Inc.
349 U.S. 70 (Supreme Court, 1955)
Sutter v. Midland Valley R.
280 U.S. 521 (Supreme Court, 1929)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Tomlin
132 S.E. 90 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. Martin
268 U.S. 458 (Supreme Court, 1925)