Davis v. Coughlin

113 A.D.2d 885, 493 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52513
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 113 A.D.2d 885 (Davis v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Coughlin, 113 A.D.2d 885, 493 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52513 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services which disciplined petitioner by imposing a penalty of 60 days’ keeplock and loss of 90 days’ good time, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Jiudice, J.), entered May 31, 1984, which annulled the determination and restored petitioner to his prior status, including restoration of lost good time. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, dated August 2, 1984, as, upon granting reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Appeal from the judgment entered May 31, 1984 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Said judgment was superseded by the order granting reargument.

Order dated August 2, 1984 reversed, insofar as reviewed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, judgment entered May 31, 1984 vacated, determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits.

Petitioner was disciplined for the violation of a departmental rule while incarcerated at Taconic Correctional Facility. Previously, at another facility, he received a copy of the Departmental Rule Guide, in which it is stated that the rules are applicable to all New York State correctional facilities. Therefore, he was subject to discipline for a violation of these rules (Correction Law § 138 [5]; see, Matter of Saunders v Smith, 99 AD2d 671). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ross v. Department of Correction of the State
722 A.2d 815 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1998)
Green v. Snow
147 A.D.2d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Taylor v. Coughlin
135 A.D.2d 992 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 A.D.2d 885, 493 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1985.