Davis v. Corizon Medical Services

Fourth Circuit

Davis v. Corizon Medical Services

558 F. App'x 324

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2014·No. No. 13-7526·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. [325] Corizon Med. Servs, No. 1:12-cv-02051-JKB, 2013 WL 4507418 (D.Md. filed Aug. 22, 2013 & entered Aug. 23, 2013). We deny Davis’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. [325] Corizon Med. Servs, No. 1:12-cv-02051-JKB, 2013 WL 4507418 (D.Md. filed Aug. 22, 2013 & entered Aug. 23, 2013). We deny Davis’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Davis v. Corizon Medical Services, 558 F. App'x 324 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

558 F. App'x 324 (Davis v. Corizon Medical Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related