Davis v. Core Civic, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma·Decided March 31, 2020·No. 6:18-cv-00396·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA EZEKIEL DAVIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. CIV 18-396-RAW-SPS ) CORECIVIC, INC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER On February 18, 2020, the Court directed the United States Marshals Service to attempt to obtain the last known addresses for Defendants Latoya Edwards, Wayda Stamey, and Justin Pham (Dkt. 115). Using the addresses provided by the Marshals Service, on February 26, 2020, summonses were issued for these defendants (Dkts. 119, 120, 122), however, all the summonses were returned unexecuted on March 9, 2020 (Dkts. 126, 127, 128). According to the returned summonses, these three defendants never were employed at Davis Correctional Facility (DCF). Id. In response to a subsequent Order (Dkt. 129), Defendant CoreCivic advised the Court that Defendant Wayda Stamey was employed as a CoreCivic employee and was employed at Davis Correctional Facility (DCF), Justin Pham was not employed by CoreCivic and was not an employee at DCF, and no employee named Latoya Edwards was employed at DCF. Defendant CoreCivic, however, identified a certain Officer Edwards who had been employed at DCF (Dkt. 130). The Court notes that Plaintiff has filed another civil rights action in this Court in Case No. 17-293-RAW-KEW, and he has named Latoya Edwards and Justin Pham as defendants in that case. On August 27, 2019, the Marshals Service attempted service of Latoya

Edwards, a.k.a. Latreena Edwards, at her last known address in Case No. 17-293-RAW- KEW.1 The Marshals Service noted the following on the USM-285 Form: “Subject no longer resides at provided address. Occupant has not idea of subject identity.” (Dkt. 246). Because the Marshals Service has not been able to locate and serve Defendants Latoya Edwards, a.k.a. Latreena Edwards, and Justin Pham, they are DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE from this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Regarding Defendant Wayda Stamey, the Court has been provided with her last known address. Therefore, the Court Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a USM-285 Form for him to sign and return within ten (10) days. The Court then will direct the Marshals Service

to attempt service on Defendant Stamey at her last known address. ACCORDINGLY, 1. Defendants Latoya Edwards, a.k.a. Latreena Edwards, and Justin Pham are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

2. The Court Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a USM-285 Form for Defendant Wayda Stamey.

1 See United States v. Pursley, 577 F.3d 1204, 1214 n.6 (10th Cir. 2009) (exercising discretion “to take judicial notice of publicly-filed records in [this] court and certain other courts concerning matters that bear directly upon the disposition of the case at hand”). 2 3. Plaintiff is directed to sign and return to the Court Clerk the USM-285 Form for Defendant Wayda Stamey within ten (10) days.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of March, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Core Civic, Inc., (E.D. Okla. 2020).

Davis v. Core Civic, Inc. (Davis v. Core Civic, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Pursley
577 F.3d 1204 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)