Davis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

N.D. Texas

Davis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

DecidedAugust 7, 2023

Docket6:22-cv-00023

StatusUnknown

This text of Davis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration (Davis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, (N.D. Tex. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO DIVISION STEVEN D.,! ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) Civil Action No. 6:22-CV-023-C-BU ORDER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that the decision of the Commissioner should be affirmed. The Court further considered Plaintiff's Objections, filed July 31, 2023. The Court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Portions of the report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989). After due consideration and having conducted a de novo review, the Court finds that Petitioner’s objections should be OVERRULED. The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge’s findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the

' To protect privacy concerns of plaintiffs in social security cases, the undersigned identifies the Plaintiff only by first name and last initial.

decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. ff SO ORDERED this ] _day of August, 2023, , Yay) tiv Prrviy Ss R. MINGS —SENIOR UNITED STASES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO DIVISION STEVEN D.,! ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) Civil Action No. 6:22-CV-023-C-BU ORDER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that the decision of the Commissioner should be affirmed. The Court further considered Plaintiff's Objections, filed July 31, 2023. The Court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Portions of the report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989). After due consideration and having conducted a de novo review, the Court finds that Petitioner’s objections should be OVERRULED. The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge’s findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the

' To protect privacy concerns of plaintiffs in social security cases, the undersigned identifies the Plaintiff only by first name and last initial.

decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. ff SO ORDERED this ] _day of August, 2023, , Yay) tiv Prrviy Ss R. MINGS —SENIOR UNITED STASES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Davis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-commissioner-social-security-administration-txnd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack