Davis v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided October 2, 2024·No. 6:23-cv-01798·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

SHAYLA LOUISE DAVIS, No. 6:23-cv-1798-AB Plaintiff, ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES V. UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO MARTIN O’MALLEY, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. BAGGIO, J., Based upon the stipulated motion [20] for Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000). Under Astrue v, Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), this award is subject to the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. Any award shall be payable to Plaintiff, except that if the Commissioner determines that Plaintiff's award is not subject to the Treasury’s Offset Program, the award shall be payable to Plaintiff's counsel: Alan Stuart Graf. Payment shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel at Alan Stuart Graf, 825 Merrimon Ave, Ste C, PMB # 354, Asheville, NC 28804 or by electronic deposit into the account of Alan Stuart Graf, ae DATED this 2 day of October, 2024. AMY M. BAGGIO United States District Judge

1 -ORDER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2024).

Davis v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Davis v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)