Davis v. City of Southfield
711 N.W.2d 71, 474 Mich. 1094
This text of 711 N.W.2d 71 (Davis v. City of Southfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davis v. City of Southfield, 711 N.W.2d 71, 474 Mich. 1094 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Valinda DAVIS, on behalf of herself and her minor children, Andre Davis, Angela Davis, Marques Davis, Timothy Davis, Christopher Davis, Ta-Mya Davis, Garnett Davis, II, and Chantal Davis, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
711 N.W.2d 71, 474 Mich. 1094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-city-of-southfield-mich-2006.