Davis v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davis v. City of Rochester

138 A.D.2d 945

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 1988·No. Appeal No. 2·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly granted summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant County of Monroe. The county is not liable for the acts of the Sheriff or his Deputies in operating the county jail (Wilson v Sponable, 81 AD2d 1, 9-12, appeal dismissed 54 NY2d 834; Local Laws, 1982, No. 1 of Monroe County § 3-a). Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any issue of fact concerning a breach of duty by the county. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Pat-low, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly granted summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant County of Monroe. The county is not liable for the acts of the Sheriff or his Deputies in operating the county jail (Wilson v Sponable, 81 AD2d 1, 9-12, appeal dismissed 54 NY2d 834; Local Laws, 1982, No. 1 of Monroe County § 3-a). Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any issue of fact concerning a breach of duty by the county. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Pat-low, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Davis v. City of Rochester, 138 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

138 A.D.2d 945 (Davis v. City of Rochester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related