Davis v. City of Des Moines

32 N.W. 470, 71 Iowa 500
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedMarch 18, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 32 N.W. 470 (Davis v. City of Des Moines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. City of Des Moines, 32 N.W. 470, 71 Iowa 500 (iowa 1887).

Opinion

Rothrock, J.

The question to be determined is, did the contract in question create an indebtedness against the city? A copy of said contract is exhibited with the answer. So far as the said contract purports to create an obligation against the city, it is as follows: “The said P. H. McCauley agrees and hereby undertakes to do and perform said work in accordance with the plans and specifications, at the following rate or price, to-wit: one dollar and seventy-four cents per lineal foot or square yard, which price shall cover the cost of the entire work. The said cost is, .under the law and ordinances of said city, to be assessed against the private property adjacent to or fronting on the street upon which said improvement is made, and a part thereof, to-wit: in seven annual installments, as provided by the law and ordinances of the city, with six per cent interest. Said assessment is payable as follows: "When such assessment is made, and any portion of the work completed and accepted by the city, certificates thereof shall be made out showing the amount levied against each piece of property, and the same shall be delivered to said P. H. McCauley, and the same shall be received by [502]*502him in full payment for said work or improvement for the payment of which a special assessment is required by the law and ordinances of said city, and delivered to said P. II. McCauley or order. Said P. H. McCauley agrees to accept said certificates in full payment for any and all work performed by him under his contract, and to collect the same by any of the methods provided by law, and at his own cost and expense; and it is expressly agreed, by and between the parties to this contract, that, upon the issuing of certificates to said P. H. McCauley for any and all work done under this contract, the same shall be received by him in full payment therefor, without recourse to the city of Res Moines, Iowa.”

It is provided by section 3, article 11, of the constitution, that icno county or other political or municipal corporation shall be allowed to become indebted in any manner, for any pur pose, to an amount in the aggregate exceeding five per centum on the value of the taxable property within such county or corporation, to be ascertained by the last state and county tax-lists previous to the incurring of said indebtedness.”

It seems to ns that the contract in question does not create an indebtedness against the city. There is no doubt that the city is authorized by law to make special assessments for improvements of this character upon property adjacent to the improvements. Such-are the plain provisions of our statute. See chapter 162, Laws 187S, and section 16, o. 168, Laws 1886. The contract involved in this case expressly provides that the certificates issued by the city shall be accepted by the contractor in full payment for his work, without recourse on the city. The city can never be held liable to any action for the construction of the sewer. Its resources cannot be aifected thereby. Its contract is fully and completely performed by ascertaining the amount properly chargeable to the adjacent property, and the issuance of assessment certificates to the contractor.

We think the demurrer to the answer was properly overruled. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richards v. City of Muscatine
237 N.W.2d 48 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1975)
Walinske v. Detroit-Wayne Joint Building Authority
39 N.W.2d 73 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1949)
Ballard-Hassett Co. v. City of Des Moines
224 N.W. 793 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1928)
Hauge v. City of Des Moines
224 N.W. 520 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1927)
Anderson v. International School District No. 5
156 N.W. 54 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1915)
City of Globe v. Willis
146 P. 544 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1915)
McGilvery v. City of Lewiston
90 P. 348 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1907)
Corey v. City of Fort Dodge
111 N.W. 6 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1907)
Vallelly v. Board of Park Commissioners
111 N.W. 615 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1907)
N. W. Halsey & Co. v. City of Belle Plaine
104 N.W. 494 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1905)
Sisson v. Board of Supervisors
70 L.R.A. 440 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1905)
City of Ottumwa v. City Water Supply Co.
119 F. 315 (Eighth Circuit, 1902)
Swanson v. City of Ottumwa
59 L.R.A. 620 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
Kronsbein v. City of Rochester
76 A.D. 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Windsor v. City of Des Moines
81 N.W. 476 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1900)
Ludington Water-Supply Co. v. City of Ludington
78 N.W. 558 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)
Reynolds v. City of Waterville
42 A. 553 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1898)
Allen v. City of Davenport
77 N.W. 532 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1898)
City of Laporte v. Gamewell Fire Alarm Telegraph Co.
45 N.E. 588 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1896)
City of Clinton v. Walliker
68 N.W. 431 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 N.W. 470, 71 Iowa 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-city-of-des-moines-iowa-1887.