Davis v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Davis v. City of Atlanta

79 S.E. 747, 13 Ga. App. 671, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 312

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 28, 1913

Docket5148

StatusPublished

This text of 79 S.E. 747 (Davis v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. City of Atlanta, 79 S.E. 747, 13 Ga. App. 671, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 312 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted by the recorder of the City of Atlanta of a violation of a municipal ordinance which makes it an offense to have on hand intoxicating liquors for the purpose of illegal sale. The petition for certiorari contained no assignment of error of law, except the general assignment that the conviction was without evidence to support it. There was some evidence to support the finding of the recorder, and this court will not disturb the judgment of the superior court in refusing to sanction the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted by the recorder of the City of Atlanta of a violation of a municipal ordinance which makes it an offense to have on hand intoxicating liquors for the purpose of illegal sale. The petition for certiorari contained no assignment of error of law, except the general assignment that the conviction was without evidence to support it. There was some evidence to support the finding of the recorder, and this court will not disturb the judgment of the superior court in refusing to sanction the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 S.E. 747, 13 Ga. App. 671, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1913.