Davis v. City & County of San Francisco

984 F.2d 345, 1993 WL 23765
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 5, 1993
DocketNo. 91-15113
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 984 F.2d 345 (Davis v. City & County of San Francisco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. City & County of San Francisco, 984 F.2d 345, 1993 WL 23765 (9th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND VACATING PORTION OF OPINION

ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellees’ petition for rehearing is denied.

However, in light of the parties’ settlement of plaintiff-appellees’ claims to expert witness fees while the court had under consideration whether to take en banc the issue of retroactivity of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 which amended 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k) to provide explicitly for the award of expert fees as part of costs, we vacate as moot that portion of the opinion that affirms the district court’s award of expert witness fees in this case.

Upon remand to the district court, we direct that, as part of the remand, it vacate that portion of its judgment that awarded expert witness fees. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
984 F.2d 345, 1993 WL 23765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-city-county-of-san-francisco-ca9-1993.