Davis v. Chaplin
27 S.E. 726, 102 Ga. 587, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 636
Opinion
This court will not reverse a judgment granting a second new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to evidence, when it appears-from the record that the evidence in support of the verdict was. at best weak and unsatisfactory, and the decided preponderance of the testimony was on the side pf the losing party. - - .
Judgment .affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Chaplin, 27 S.E. 726, 102 Ga. 587, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 636 (Ga. 1897).
27 S.E. 726 (Davis v. Chaplin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Simpson v. Brand
133 S.E.2d 393 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Ansley v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
71 S.E.2d 434 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Mills v. State
4 S.E.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Allen v. Southern Insurance Securities Corp.
187 S.E. 714 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Hartis v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
119 S.E. 349 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Morgan v. Lamb
85 S.E. 792 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Randolph
71 S.E. 887 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Stewart v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
60 S.E. 1 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Dethrage v. City of Rome
54 S.E. 654 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Daniels v. Leonard
32 S.E. 122 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)