Davis v. Cecil
384 U.S. 915, 16 L. Ed. 2d 444, 86 S. Ct. 1369, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1769
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 25, 1966
DocketNo. 844
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 384 U.S. 915 (Davis v. Cecil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davis v. Cecil, 384 U.S. 915, 16 L. Ed. 2d 444, 86 S. Ct. 1369, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1769 (1966).
Opinion
In light of the representations of the Attorney General of Michigan that a copy of the transcript of the United States District Court has been furnished the petitioner, and it appearing from the papers on file that the petitioner has received the relief he sought, the motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Robert S. Sciolino
505 F.2d 586 (Second Circuit, 1974)
Nichols v. Smith
489 S.W.2d 719 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1973)
United States v. Ralph 'Whitey' Tropiano, Lawrence R. Pellegrino and William Grasso,defendants-Appellants
418 F.2d 1069 (Second Circuit, 1969)
Friedman v. Younger
46 F.R.D. 444 (C.D. California, 1969)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
384 U.S. 915, 16 L. Ed. 2d 444, 86 S. Ct. 1369, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-cecil-scotus-1966.