Davis v. Cecil
384 U.S. 915, 16 L. Ed. 2d 444, 86 S. Ct. 1369, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1769
Opinion
In light of the representations of the Attorney General of Michigan that a copy of the transcript of the United States District Court has been furnished the petitioner, and it appearing from the papers on file that the petitioner has received the relief he sought, the motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Cecil, 384 U.S. 915, 16 L. Ed. 2d 444, 86 S. Ct. 1369, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1769 (1966).
384 U.S. 915 (Davis v. Cecil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Robert S. Sciolino
505 F.2d 586 (Second Circuit, 1974)
Nichols v. Smith
489 S.W.2d 719 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1973)
United States v. Ralph 'Whitey' Tropiano, Lawrence R. Pellegrino and William Grasso,defendants-Appellants
418 F.2d 1069 (Second Circuit, 1969)
Friedman v. Younger
46 F.R.D. 444 (C.D. California, 1969)