Davis v. Carter

Eighth Circuit

Davis v. Carter

249 F. App'x 486

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 4, 2007

DocketNo. 06-3467

StatusPublished

This text of 249 F. App'x 486 (Davis v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Carter, 249 F. App'x 486 (8th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

H.G. Davis appeals the district court’s¹ order denying his motion to set aside judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s dismissal of his postjudgment motion as untimely. See Middleton v. McDonald, 388 F.3d 614, 616 (8th Cir.2004) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

H.G. Davis appeals the district court’s¹ order denying his motion to set aside judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s dismissal of his postjudgment motion as untimely. See Middleton v. McDonald, 388 F.3d 614, 616 (8th Cir.2004) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 F. App'x 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-carter-ca8-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack