Davis v. Carter

Eighth Circuit

Davis v. Carter

249 F. App'x 486

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2007·No. No. 06-3467·Published

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

H.G. Davis appeals the district court’s¹ order denying his motion to set aside judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s dismissal of his postjudgment motion as untimely. See Middleton v. McDonald, 388 F.3d 614, 616 (8th Cir.2004) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

H.G. Davis appeals the district court’s¹ order denying his motion to set aside judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s dismissal of his postjudgment motion as untimely. See Middleton v. McDonald, 388 F.3d 614, 616 (8th Cir.2004) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Davis v. Carter, 249 F. App'x 486 (8th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

249 F. App'x 486 (Davis v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related