Davis v. Capital Transit Co

198 F.2d 528, 91 U.S. App. D.C. 417, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3196
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 26, 1952
Docket11128
StatusPublished

This text of 198 F.2d 528 (Davis v. Capital Transit Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Capital Transit Co, 198 F.2d 528, 91 U.S. App. D.C. 417, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3196 (D.C. Cir. 1952).

Opinion

198 F.2d 528

91 U.S.App.D.C. 417

DAVIS et al.
v.
CAPITAL TRANSIT CO.

No. 11128.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 17, 1952.
Decided June 26, 1952.

Alvin L. Newmyer, Jr., Washington, D.C., with whom Alvin L. Newmyer, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellants. David G. Bress, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellants.

Paul R. Connolly, Washington, D.C., with whom John J. Sirica, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in a suit for personal injuries by negligence, in which the evidence was conflicting, appeals from an adverse judgment based on a jury's verdict. We find no prejudicial error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 F.2d 528, 91 U.S. App. D.C. 417, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-capital-transit-co-cadc-1952.