Davis v. Cadillac Mutual Insurance

227 N.W.2d 275, 58 Mich. App. 170, 1975 Mich. App. LEXIS 1683
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 29, 1975
DocketDocket 19510
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 227 N.W.2d 275 (Davis v. Cadillac Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Cadillac Mutual Insurance, 227 N.W.2d 275, 58 Mich. App. 170, 1975 Mich. App. LEXIS 1683 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

*171 Quinn, P. J.

Plaintiff, the insured, filed this action in common pleas court against defendant, his insurer, to recover for a collision loss. Defendant denied coverage of the loss on the basis that plaintiff’s policy of insurance had been cancelled prior to the collision.

The trial court found that the cancellation was ineffective because the notice of cancellation was not sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, as required by MCLA 500.3224(2); MSA 24.13224(2). Judgment entered for plaintiff and defendant appealed to the circuit court, which affirmed the trial court. On leave granted, defendant appeals.

The facts are not in dispute nor are they important to decision. The controlling issue is whether the policy issued to plaintiff by defendant is governed by MCLA 500.3224(2), supra. Defendant admits that notice of cancellation was not sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. It was sent certified mail and it was received by plaintiff.

The statute involved is found in chapter 32 of the insurance code. This chapter is entitled "Cancellation of Automobile Liability Policies”. The term "automobile liability policy” is used throughout the chapter. The policy that defendant issued to plaintiff provided collision and comprehensive coverage, and defendant contends that neither is liability coverage.

The term "automobile liability policy” is not defined in the insurance code nor by any decision, so far as we can determine. MCLA 8.3a; MSA 2.212(1) requires that words and phrases shall be construed and understood according to the common and approved usage of the language. Webster’s New International Dictionary (3rd ed unabridged) defines "automobile liability insurance” as:

*172 "Insurance against loss from or legal liability for damages arising out of ownership, maintenance, or operation of a motor vehicle.”

We find that "automobile liability insurance” is synonymous with "automobile liability policy” in the context of the statute involved.

Affirmed with costs to plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Causin v. Auto Club Insurance
536 N.W.2d 247 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1995)
Auto-Owners Insurance v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America
266 S.E.2d 175 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Dorsey v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.
250 N.W.2d 143 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
Celina Mutual Insurance v. Falls
249 N.W.2d 323 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 N.W.2d 275, 58 Mich. App. 170, 1975 Mich. App. LEXIS 1683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-cadillac-mutual-insurance-michctapp-1975.