Davis v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

FREDERICK JAMAL DAVIS CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS NO. 17-3140

BP EXPLORATION & SECTION M (2) PRODUCTION INC., et al.

ORDER & REASONS Before the Court is a motion by plaintiff Frederick Jamal Davis to disqualify the undersigned from these proceedings.1 The same motion has been filed and fully briefed in many other B3 cases allotted to this section of court. Having considered the parties’ memoranda, the record, and the applicable law, the Court denies the motion for the reasons articulated at length in the Order & Reasons issued in Carpenter v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., 2022 WL 2800014 (E.D. La. July 14, 2022), because there is no actual conflict of interest or appearance of impropriety, and the motion was untimely filed. A judge has an affirmative duty not to disqualify himself or herself unnecessarily, and because Davis raises no compelling or persuasive grounds for disqualification here, it is unnecessary and, indeed, would be improper for the undersigned to do so. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Davis’s motion to disqualify (R. Doc. 62) is DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 19th day of August, 2022.

________________________________ BARRY W. ASHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 R. Doc. 62.