Davis v. Bogart
This text of 22 N.Y.S. 1114 (Davis v. Bogart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No opinion. Judgment and order reversed on the exceptions, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held : (1) That the court erred in receiving evidence of the declarations of the witness Buskey ; (2) that there was-no evidence that the plaintiff’s mortgage was fraudulent as against Buskey’» creditors, and the court improperly refused to charge the jury to that effect; (3) the court improperly refused to charge that the price agreed upon between the defendant and Buskey for keeping the mule was conclusive upon the defendant, and he could not claim a lien upon the mule for any greater sum for such keeping.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 N.Y.S. 1114, 66 Hun 630, 73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 630, 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-bogart-nysupct-1892.