Davis v. Blount & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Davis v. Blount & Co.

77 S.E. 189, 12 Ga. App. 336, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 556

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 18, 1913

Docket4240

StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.E. 189 (Davis v. Blount & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Blount & Co., 77 S.E. 189, 12 Ga. App. 336, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 556 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

Upon all the substantial issues, the finding of the judge of the superior court (who tried the case without the intervention of a jury), being supported by some evidence, is, so far as this court is concerned, conclusive, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Certiorari; from Johnson superior court—Judge Hawkins. May 3, 1912.

E. L. Stephens, for plaintiff in error. B. B. Blovmt, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

Upon all the substantial issues, the finding of the judge of the superior court (who tried the case without the intervention of a jury), being supported by some evidence, is, so far as this court is concerned, conclusive, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Certiorari; from Johnson superior court—Judge Hawkins. May 3, 1912.

E. L. Stephens, for plaintiff in error. B. B. Blovmt, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 S.E. 189, 12 Ga. App. 336, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-blount-co-gactapp-1913.