Davis v. Blount
This text of 74 F. App'x 675 (Davis v. Blount) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Arkansas inmate Kurt Robert Davis appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam), we conclude that the district court properly dismissed the complaint because Davis’s public defender was not a government actor, see Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325, 102 S.Ct. 445, 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981); Eling v. Jones, 797 F.2d 697, 698-99 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 917, 107 S.Ct. 1371, 94 L.Ed.2d 687 (1987). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 F. App'x 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-blount-ca8-2003.