Davis v. Blount

74 F. App'x 675
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 25, 2003
DocketNo. 03-2581
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F. App'x 675 (Davis v. Blount) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Blount, 74 F. App'x 675 (8th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Kurt Robert Davis appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam), we conclude that the district court properly dismissed the complaint because Davis’s public defender was not a government actor, see Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325, 102 S.Ct. 445, 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981); Eling v. Jones, 797 F.2d 697, 698-99 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 917, 107 S.Ct. 1371, 94 L.Ed.2d 687 (1987). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Polk County v. Dodson
454 U.S. 312 (Supreme Court, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F. App'x 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-blount-ca8-2003.