Davis v. Blankenship
91 S.E.2d 916, 243 N.C. 693, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 604
Opinion
A careful consideration of the exceptions and assignments of error brought forward and discussed in the appellants’ brief leads us to the conclusion that no error sufficiently prejudicial to justify a new trial has been shown. Hence, in the trial below we find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Blankenship, 91 S.E.2d 916, 243 N.C. 693, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 604 (N.C. 1956).
91 S.E.2d 916 (Davis v. Blankenship) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brinson v. Kirby
110 S.E.2d 482 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)