Davis v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.
This text of 699 F. App'x 234 (Davis v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Sabrina D. Davis appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment for Defendant in Davis’s civil action related to a life insurance claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in' for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Bankers Life & Cas. Co., No. 6:16-cv-03100-TMC, 2017 WL 2703972 (D.S.C. June 23, 2017). We deny Davis’s request to remove this appeal to another United States Circuit Court and her motion for Defendant to correct its informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
699 F. App'x 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-bankers-life-casualty-co-ca4-2017.