Davis v. Balkcom
121 S.E.2d 505, 217 Ga. 205, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 494
Opinion
The exception is to a judgment in a habeas corpus case remanding the prisoner to the officer of the law after a trial and presentation of evidence. There is no approved brief of evidence embodied in the bill of exceptions, nor as a separate document in the record. This utter [206]*206failure to present a brief of the evidence requires an affirmance since no exception therein can be ruled on without recourse to the evidence. Attaway v. Duncan, 206 Ga. 230 (56 SE2d 269).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Balkcom, 121 S.E.2d 505, 217 Ga. 205, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 494 (Ga. 1961).
121 S.E.2d 505 (Davis v. Balkcom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Attaway v. Duncan
56 S.E.2d 269 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)