Davis v. Balkcom

121 S.E.2d 505, 217 Ga. 205, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 494
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 12, 1961·No. 21322·Published

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The exception is to a judgment in a habeas corpus case remanding the prisoner to the officer of the law after a trial and presentation of evidence. There is no approved brief of evidence embodied in the bill of exceptions, nor as a separate document in the record. This utter [206]*206failure to present a brief of the evidence requires an affirmance since no exception therein can be ruled on without recourse to the evidence. Attaway v. Duncan, 206 Ga. 230 (56 SE2d 269).

Submitted September 11, 1961 — Decided September 12, 1961. William B. Harrell, for plaintiff in error. Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Earl L. Hickman, Assistant Attorney-General, B. Daniel Dubberly, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney-General, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Balkcom, 121 S.E.2d 505, 217 Ga. 205, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 494 (Ga. 1961).

121 S.E.2d 505 (Davis v. Balkcom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Attaway v. Duncan
56 S.E.2d 269 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)