Davis v. Atkinson
289 S.W.3d 693, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 659, 2009 WL 1181484
Opinion
ORDER
Timothy J. Davis appeals from a judgment entered after jury trial on his claim for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. Davis contends that the damages awarded by the jury were so inadequate that the trial court abused its discretion in denying him a new trial. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Atkinson, 289 S.W.3d 693, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 659, 2009 WL 1181484 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
289 S.W.3d 693 (Davis v. Atkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Boehm
289 S.W.3d 693 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)